By Dave Kearns
Last week, and continuing this week, I've been using the
Windows
Networking newsletter to explore the
seemingly annual changes to Microsoft's licensing agreements as
the Redmond behemoth tries to find the best way to extract the
most dollars from its customers.
Novell PR maven extraordinaire Bruce Lowry points out
in his blog that the very
idea of licensing might be the key to removing Microsoft's
dominance in the software arena.
He points out that while we usually consider open source as a
development model (a community of interested parties working
together to develop an application or service) it's also a
business model. Lowry posits that: "We're moving from a world
built on a software licensing model to one built on a
subscription model around services and upgrade protection. This
is what we've all called 'maintenance' in the traditional
software world."
That may be a self-serving prophecy, as Novell's licensing
revenue continues to fall while its maintenance revenue shows a
slow-but-steady increase. Licensing income is falling faster
than maintenance income is rising, but Novell does have deep
pockets. (For a closer look at Novell's financials, see its most
recent quarterly report.)
Lowry concludes that: "This [Novell's greater dependence on
maintenance revenue] makes the move to subscription revenue
under an open-source model less disruptive to us than it might
be to companies still heavily dependent on license revenues. You
can figure out who those companies might be." One assumes he
turned, faced the northwest and winked in the general direction
of Redmond, Wash., when he said that.
He's not the only one who thinks that Microsoft is having
trouble in moving from licensing- to subscription-based revenue.
About the upcoming release of Microsoft Windows Vista, Gartner
Group said: "Microsoft wishes to release a new version of
Windows by year-end 2006 to shore up revenue and appease
customers that paid for Software Assurance on the client OS..."
(See "Figuring out Microsoft licenses is hungry work"
for my newsletter about Microsoft licenses.)
Novell's licensing, maintenance and upgrade protection have
always been easier to figure out than Microsoft's. Some thought
it was because Novell offered fewer products bundled in fewer
assortments. Or, just maybe, Novell has always understood better
than Gates and Company what the future revenue stream should
look like.
The top 5: Today's most-read stories
1. Cisco talking IP-radio nets
2. How to respond to a security breach
3. School traps infected PCs in its web
4. Cartoon of the Week
5. CTO: BellSouth lost 9 COs to Katrina
To contact Dave Kearns:
Dave Kearns is a writer and consultant in Silicon Valley. He's
written a number of books including the (sadly) now out of print
"Peter Norton's Complete Guide to Networks." His musings can be
found here.
|